Which statement best describes boundary management in ethical coaching relationships?

• A. Secrecy and personal favoritism
• B. No boundaries
• C. Professional boundaries, mutual respect, transparent expectations, and supervision
• D. Informality and constant changes

Answer: (C)

Boundary management in ethical coaching is about creating clear, professional limits that protect both coach and athlete and promote a trustworthy, safe relationship. When boundaries are well defined, the coach maintains professional boundaries—keeping interactions appropriate, timeframes and channels for communication clear, and avoiding situations that could blur lines between personal and professional roles.

Mutual respect is essential because it ensures the athlete’s dignity and autonomy are honored, and decisions are made with fairness and care. Transparent expectations help both parties understand goals, roles, confidentiality, and what feedback or oversight will look like, so there are no hidden assumptions or misunderstandings. Supervision provides ongoing accountability and a space to reflect on ethical issues, ensuring practices stay aligned with standards and best interests.

Options that rely on secrecy and personal favoritism undermine trust and create conflicts of interest. A complete lack of boundaries invites exploitation or harm. Informality and constant changes erode reliability and professionalism. Together, professional boundaries, mutual respect, transparent expectations, and supervision form the framework for ethical coaching relationships.